The Mystery of the Vanished Citations
James McConnell’s Forgotten 1960s Quest for Planarian Learning,
a Biochemical Engram, & Celebrity
by Mark Rilling
The Missing 1960s Decade
Memory transfer: McConnell’s Blind Alley
McConnell’s Struggle With Critics Over Invertebrate Learning
Controlling for Experimenter Bias
Controlling for Pseudoconditioning & Sensitization
McConnell’s Origin Myth for Planarian Learning
Escaping peer review as a celebrity-scientist
The Worm Runner’s Digest: Peer Review Versus the 1960s Counterculture
Attracting the Unabomber. While overselling behavior modification
The Assassination Attempt
Overpopularizing Behavior Modification
Conclusion: Some Historical Lessons for Today from the 1960s
References
Conclusion: Some Historical Lessons for Today from the 1960s
The history of invertebrate learning illustrates how ideas are assimilated by the scientific community. During the 1930s, invertebrates were considered little robots, guided by instincts, in which the ability to learn was, at most, ephemeral. During the 1960s, James McConnell, a creative, charismatic comparative psychologist, used the media and revolutionary rhetoric from the counterculture to glamorize planarian learning and to attack the view of the scientific establishment that invertebrates could not learn. McConnell used a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. When the adequacy of the early data was challenged by critics, McConnell and others caught up in the espirit de corps for planarian learning introduced control groups that are still used today for Pavlovian conditioning. Although his memory-transfer paradigm for studying the biochemical basis of memory was a failure, McConnell has not received the credit he deserves for establishing invertebrate learning. Today, invertebrate learning is so well established that citations to the earlier work are no longer considered necessary. Replication and peer review worked well for evaluating McConnell’s scientific ideas.
Unfortunately, peer review does not provide a mechanism for regulating the popularization of psychological ideas by the media because journalists and the producers of television shows are not experts on the science. Because psychologists have a First Amendment right to express their views on psychological topics as they see fit, the problem of how to popularize psychology without misleading the public does not have a simple solution. As a celebrity-scientist, McConnell presented the mass audience of television, radio, and the popular press with a mixture of basic scientific information about Pavlovian conditioning in invertebrates, futuristic predictions about a memory pill, and entertainment. As a science writer, McConnell promised the public more than he could deliver. After the collapse of the planarian project, McConnell became a shill for B. F. Skinner’s brand of behavior modification. A behavioral engineer could guarantee that a suitably retrained prisoner with a new personality would never commit a crime. Ultimately, McConnell became more adept at publicity than in providing original contributions to the science. It appears that McConnell’s public relations efforts on behalf of behavior modification led to an assassination attempt on him by the Unabomber, a Luddite opposed to behavioral engineering.
McConnell deserves to be remembered not only for his scientific creativity, but also because he was one of our field’s great popular writers. The public expects prophecy from its scientists. However, McConnell did pay a cost. He provided the public with the prophecy they expected and received the fleeting fame that comes from the publicity of the moment, but at the price of professional ostracism. Fidelity to the peer-reviewed literature is proposed as an ethical standard for evaluating coverage of psychological topics for and by the media.
The Mystery of the Vanished Citations
References
Alport, S. (1986). Explorers ofthe black box: The searchfor the cellular basis of memory. New York: Norton.
Animal life: Strangest of tails. (1959, September 21). Newsweek, 54, p. 110.
Baxter, R., & Kimmel, H. D. (1963). Conditioning and extinction in the planarian. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 665-669.
Beach, E A. (1950). The snark was a boojum. American Psychologist, 5, 115-124.
Benjamin, L. T. (1986). Why don’t they understand us? A history of psychology’s public image. American Psychologist, 41, 941-946.
Bird, J. (1964, March 28). The worm learns. Saturday Evening Post, 237, pp. 66-67.
Bitterman, M. E. (1975). Critical commentary. In W. C. Corning, J. A. Dyal, & A. O. D. Willows (Eds.), Invertebrate learning (Vol 3, pp. 139-145). New York: Plenum.
Block, R. A., & McConnell, J. V. (1967). Classically conditioned discrimination in the planarian, Dugesia dorotocephala. Nature, 215, 1465-1467.
Bomber links an end of killings to his manifesto. (1995, June 30). The New York Times, p. 1.
Brown, J. (1992). The definition ofa profession: The authority ofmetaphor in the history of intelligence testing, 1890-1930. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carew, T.J., Walters, E. T., & Kandel, E. R. (1981). Classical conditioning in a simple withdrawal reflex in Aplysia californica. The Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 1426-1437.
Cmiel, K. (1994). The politics of civility. In D. C. Farber (Ed.), The sixties: From memory to history (pp. 263-290). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Collins, H., & Pinch, T. ( 1993). The Golem: What everyone should know about science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Cordaro, L., & Ison, J. R. (1963). Psychology of the scientist: Observer bias in classical conditioning of the planarian. Psychological Reports, 13, 787-789.
DeZazzo, J., & Tully, T. (1995). Dissection of memory formation: From behavioral pharmacology to molecular genetics. Trends of Neuroscience, 18, 212-218.
Donegan, N. H., & Thompson, R. E (199l). The search for the engram. In J. L. Martinez & R. E Kesner (Eds.), Learning and memory: A biological view (2nd ed., pp. 3-58). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Farber, D. C. (1994). The sixties: From memory to history. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Finger, S. (1994). Origins ofneuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Herman, E. (1995). The romance ofAmerican psychology. Political culture in the age of experts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hilgard, E. R. (1948). Theories oflearning. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts.
Jacobson, A. L., Horowitz, S. D., & Fried, C. (1967). Classical conditioning, pseudoconditioning, or sensitization in the planarian. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64, 73-79.
Jensen, D. D. (1965). Paramecia, planaria, pseudo-learning. Animal Behavior Supplement, 1, 9.
Koestler, A. (1965). Introduction: Behold the lowly worm. In J. V. McConnell (Ed.), The worm returns: The best from The Worm Runner’s Digest (pp. xvii-xxv). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(Original story appeared in the London Observer, April 30, 1961).
Krasne, F. B., & Glanzman, D. L. (1995). What we can learn from invertebrate learning. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual review ofpsychology (Vol. 46, pp. 585-624). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.
Maler, N. R. F., & Schneirla, T. C. (1935). Principles ofanimalpsychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
McConnell, J. V. (1956). The after-effects of rotation of the visual environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
McConnell, J. V. (1959). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 1,1.
McConnell, J. V. (1960). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 2, 1-3.
McConnell,J. V.( 1961a). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 3, 1-3.
McConnell, J. V.(196 lb). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 3, 153-156.
McConnell, J. V. (1962). Memory transfer through cannibalism in planarians. Journal of Neuropsychiatry (Suppl.), 42-48.
McConnell, J. V. (1964). Cannibalism and memory in flatworms. New Scientist, 21, 465—468.
McConnell, J. V. (1965). Learning theory. In J. V. McConnell (Ed.), The Worm Returns: The best from The Worm Runner’s Digest (pp. 164-178). Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
McConnell, J. V. (1966). Comparative physiology: Learning in invertebrates. In V. E. Hall, A. C. Giese, & R. R. Sonnenschein (Eds.), Annual review of physiology (pp. 107-136). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
McConnell, J. V. (1967a). A manual of psychological experimentation on planarians (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: The Worm Runners Digest.
McConnell,J. V.(1967b). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 9, 1-8.
McConnell, J. V. (1968). Psychoanalysis must go. Esquire, 70, pp. 176, 279-280, 283-287.
McConnell, J. V. (1969). Confessions of a scientific humorist. Impact of Science on Society, 19, 241-252.
McConnell, J. V.(1970). Criminals can be brainwashed now. Psychology Today, 13, pp. 14, 16, 18, 74.
McConnell, J. V. (1973). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 15, 1-3.
McConnell, J. V.(1974a). Understanding human behavior (I st ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
McConnell,J. V.(1974b). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 16, 1-3.
McConnell, J. V. (1978). Confessions of a textbook writer. American Psychologist, 33, 159-169.
McConnell, J. V. (1979). Worms and things. The Worm Runner’s Digest, 21, 1-2.
McConnell, J. V.(1983). Understanding human behavior (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
McConneU, J. V. (1987). Hear! Hear! Fanfare, 10, 282-288.
McConneU, J. V., Jacobson, A. L., & Kimble, D. P. (1959). The effects of regeneration upon retention of a conditioned response in the planarian. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 1-5.
McConnell, J. V., Jaeobson, R., & Maynard, D. M. (1959). Apparent retention of a conditioned response following total regeneration in the planarian. American Psychologist, 14, 410.
McConnell, J. V., & Shelby, J. M. (1970). Memory transfer experiments in invertebrates. In G. Ungar (Ed.), Molecular mechanisms in memory and learning (pp. 71-101). New York: Plenum Press.
Moskowitz, I. (Program Director). (1964, April 24). School for worms: Interview with James V. McConnell. The Steve Allen Show. Los Angeles: Curtis Circulation. Polsgrove, C. (1995). It wasn’t pretty folks, but didn’t we have fun? Esquire in the sixties. New York: Norton.
Rose, S. (1992). The making of memory. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
Serial bomber sent letters before package blast. (1995, April 26). The New York Times, p. 1.
Service, R. E (1994). Will a new type of drug make memory-making easier? Science, 266, 218-219.
Thompson, R., & McConnell, J. (1955). Classical conditioning in the planarian, Dugesia dorotocephala. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48, 65-68.
Thorne, B. M. (1995). Robert Thompson: Karl I.ashley’s heir? Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 31, 129-136.
Todd, J. T., Dewsbury, D. A., Logue, A. W., & Dryden, N. A. (1994).
Appendix: John B. Watson: A bibliography of published works. In J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (Eds.), Modern perspectives on John B. Watson and classical behaviorism (pp. 169-177). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Travis, D. (1980). On the construction of creativity: The memory transfer phenomenon and the importance of being earnest. In K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social process ofscientific investigation, sociology of the sciences (Vol. IV, pp. 165-193). Boston: D. Reidel.
Travis, G. D. L. (1981). Replicating replication? Aspects of the social construction oflearning in planarian worms. Social Studies of Science 11, 11-32.